Read + Write + Report
Home | Start a blog | About Orble | FAQ | Blogs | Writers | Paid | My Orble | Login
Ex- Panama dictator Manuel Noriega goes on trial in France. By Timothy Lawson Former Panamanian military dictator Manuel Noriega, 76, went on trial in Paris on Monday following his extradition to France in April this year. Noriega has been accused by France of laundering $3 million of Colombian drug money through French bank accounts during his reign as leader of Panama from 1983 through to 1989.

As General, from 1983 Noriega ran Panama with military control: up until he was deposed by the US armed forces when they invaded Panama in 1989. Noriega was detained as a prisoner of war and taken to the United States to await trial. In April 1992, Noriega was tried and convicted by a US court on a number of charges – including money laundering – relating to his cooperation with the Medellin drug cartel, a prominent criminal organisation which operated primarily throughout the 1980’s. Noriega helped the cartel, letting them ship large amounts of cocaine through Panama to the U S in return for financial compensation. Noriega, whom was contracted by the US Central Intelligence Service (CIA) in the 1950’s and worked with them up until the 1980’s, failed to succeed at arguing his crimes were part of his work for the CIA and was subsequently sentenced to 40 years in prison; this was later reduced to 30, of which Noriega served 17.


An article published at the time in the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) student newspaper The Tech made point that “the United States took the extraordinary step of invading a foreign country to bring its leader to trial.” The US-led invasion of Iraq, which occurred in 2003, has led to similar sentiments in regards to the deposition of former Iraqi leader, Saddam Hussein. According to an article published on the Al Jazeera English website: “Monday’s trial comes more than a decade after a French court sentenced Noriega in absentia to 10 years in prison for laundering several million dollars in cocaine profits through three major French banks.” This occurred in June, 1999; Noriega and his wife were both sentenced to 10 years in prison and were fined $33 million for money laundering. Under French law, defendants convicted in absentia are entitled to a new trial.


Following the approval of France’s extradition request in April, current Panamanian President, Ricardo Martinelli, announced on Wednesday that Panama will request that after being tried in France, Noriega be extradited to his home country, where he faces a number of charges, including murder and human rights violations. This may happen if he is found not guilty by the French courts: if convicted in France, the extradition of Noriega to Panama could occur after serving time in a French prison. An American Free Press (AFP) article published in April this year quoted President Martinelli who stated: “Panama will present the extradition request in accordance with our laws, but it all depends on the French government.” Panamanian Vice President and Foreign Affairs Minister, Carlos Varela, said that Panama has no extradition treaty with France, but that Noriega’s extradition would be “viable” if called for by the courts. "We are not going to allow Noriega to spend one day not serving his sentence in Panama, after he serves his sentence in France," Varela told AFP reporters.

Noriega was convicted in absentia on murder charges in Panama in 1995, receiving a 20 year sentence: One of three 20-year sentences for human rights abuses according to an AFP article. Noriega’s legal team have appealed France’s extradition of the Panamanian strong-man on the grounds that the country will not honour his legal status as a POW. Noriega’s lawyers have appealed to the humanitarian organisation, the Red Cross, contending that their clients prison conditions were unsatisfactory because the prison was decrepit, the General was deprived of his uniform and his medals and that he was denied access to a Spanish-speaking doctor: They also pointed to the 76-year olds deteriorating health, making mention that he was partially paralysed by a stroke he suffered four years ago: reported Al Jazeera.

Noriega has also claimed to have found God, proclaiming himself a born-again Christian while awaiting his 1992 trial in the US. "I received Jesus Christ as my Saviour the 15th May of 1990 at 11 A.M.," Noriega was quoted as saying in a New York Times article. While awaiting his US trial, Noriega met with Clift Brannon a preacher and former attorney. After their visit Noriega wrote to Brannon saying: “On completing the spiritual sessions that you as a messenger of the Word of God brought to my heart, even to my area of confinement as Prisoner of War of the United States, I feel the necessity of adding something more to what I was able to say to you as we parted. The evening sessions of May 15 and 16 with you and Rudy Hernandez along with the Christian explanation and guidance were for me the first day of a dream, a revelation. I can tell you with great strength and inspiration that receiving our Lord Jesus Christ as Savior guided by you, was an emotional event. The hours flew by without my being aware. I could have desired that they continue forever, but there was no time nor space. Thank you for your time. Thank you for your human warmth, for your constant and permanent spiritual strength brought to bear on my mind and soul. – With great affection, Manuel A. Noriega.

It seems most likely that Noriega’s proclaimed spiritual enlightenment, old-age, deteriorating health and loss of his rank, medals and POW status, will not be sufficient enough to keep the ex-Dictator out of Prison in France. The French Legion of Honour recipient will most likely be stripped of this most prestigious award if convicted on money laundering charges in France.
96
Vote
   


Gaza flotilla raid: detailed recap

June 11th 2010 17:26
On May 31st, the Israeli navy conducted a pre-dawn raid on the ‘Gaza Freedom Flotilla’ - a group of six ships carrying over 10 000 tonnes of aid supplies and over 600 pro-Palestinian activists from 37 countries.

At 4:30 am, Israeli Shayetet 13 Special Forces, descended upon the ships while they were in international waters; the operation was dubbed ‘Operation Sea Breeze’ by the Israel Defense Forces (IDF). On board the main ship, the MV Mavi Marmara, activists engaged in combat with Israeli commandos who had abseiled onto the deck of the vessel.

During the fighting, nine activists were shot and killed by Israeli soldiers and, according to a recent Ynet News article forty-two other passengers were wounded. Eight of the dead were Turkish nationals and the other was an American of Turkish descent. The IDF suffered no casualties, although seven commandos were wounded, with two of them receiving severe injuries.

Two ships from the Gaza Flotilla


The flotilla was aiming to break the naval component of the Gaza blockade, which can be described as an Israeli and Egyptian cooperative naval, land, and air blockade surrounding the Gaza strip; it was initially implemented by Israel and Egypt during June 2007 as a reaction to Hamas winning the 2006 Palestinian legislative election.

In mapping out the events, it is useful to begin with the 2006 Palestinian election, as this was a key event in shaping the current political leadership in the country. Soon after being legitimately and democratically elected, Hamas refused to uphold agreements made between the preceding Palestinian Government, led by the Palestinian National Authority (PNA), and Israel. This and other similar events sparked a brief internal military conflict between Hamas and rival political party, Fatah.

The conflict culminted in Hamas controlling the Gaza Strip and Fatah controlling the West Bank. This led to the current Gaza blockade, which is employed jointly by Egypt and Israel, and seals off the entire Gaza Strip. According to a BBC News article, the amount of goods allowed entry into the Gaza Strip by Israel is one quarter of the amount prior to the blockade.

Israeli warship


Israel insists the blockade is needed to limit Palestinian rocket attacks on its cities; According to Haaretz, an Isreali newspaper, Egypt argues that lifting their section of the blockade would imply a recognition on its part of the Hamas government of Gaza, thus further widening the schism between Gaza and the West Bank.

In the days leading up to the raid, the Israeli government requested that the flotilla dock in Israel at Ashdod, so that the aid supplies could be checked by Israeli authorities. The flotilla declined this request, saying (as quoted in Haaretz): “This mission is not about delivering humanitarian supplies, it’s about breaking Israel’s siege on 1.5 million Palestinians.” It was announced by some supporters of the flotilla that “a violent response from Israel will breathe new life into the Palestine solidarity movement, drawing attention to the blockade.”

Arguments are still raging about who the initial aggressor was when the Israeli Special Forces boarded the MV Mavi Marmara. An article in The Australian expresses some frustration that people are still trying to proclaim the innocence of the activists on board the main ship, pointing to evidence that surfaced following the raids, stating: “the activists involved know they lost the first debate. Footage proves they used metal poles, knives, Molotov cocktails and live ammunition against Israeli soldiers, blowing out of the water claims of non-violence. The second, the flotilla was never about delivering aid; its organisers refused to co-operate with Israel, Egypt or the UN to have the goods delivered. Rather, the flotilla was about embarrassing Israel and bringing to light Israel's Gaza blockade.” The article also discussed the revelation that one of the organisations supporting the flotilla,, a Turkish NGO, has been linked with Hamas and other Jihadist organisations.

Palestinian supporters


These events seemed to quell some of criticism directed at Israel by other international actors because, initially, international response to the botched raid was of widespread outrage and condemnation. Many protests took place around the world following the incident. The United Nations Security Council strongly condemned “those acts resulting in civilian deaths”, demanded an unbiased investigation and called for the immediate release of citizens detained by Israel. The UN Human Rights Council dispatched a team to investigate alleged violations of international law.

Israel claims the activists ambushed the commandos after they descended onto the board from helicopters; the IDF and Turkish TV has each released separate footage that supports this claim.

However, activists and journalists on board the ship have claimed that the Israeli commandoes started shooting before they boarded. Al Jazeera journalist, Jamal Elshayyal, writes in his blog on the Al Jazeera website that: “just after 4am local time, the Israeli military attacked the ship, in international waters. It was an unprovoked attack. Tear gas was used, sound grenades were launched, and rubber coated steel bullets were fired from almost every direction.” He describes the scene when the shooting began saying: “commandos on board the choppers joined the firing, using live ammunition, before any of the soldiers had descended onto the ship.”Activists on board at the time later stated that while they did engage in combat with the Israeli soldiers, they acted in self defense because the vessels were boarded by a military force.

In a section of an article in The Australian which comes to the conclusion that Israel is caught in a vicious cycle whereby “the more its hawk-thinks, the more the outside world will always hate it, the more it tends to shoot opponents first and ask questions later, and the more it finds that the world is indeed full of enemies. Though Israeli leader, Mr Netanyahu, has reluctantly agreed to freeze settlement-building and is negotiating indirectly with Palestinians, he does not give the impression of being willing to give ground in the interests of peace.”

As for the implications of this incident? It is doubtful that any of the main players have emerged from the last fortnight with their reputations intact. Israel has been criticized for what is seen as a tendency to lose its nerve and resort to deploying overly aggressive tactics. The IDF’s decision to send in commandos to turn the boats around also raises legal issues in regards to how the flotilla was handled at an organizational level. However, the activists should not escape censure for their violent actions, which justifiably undermined claims that they were ‘peace activists’. The fact that it has been established that some of the activists had close ties to terrorist groups and have lied about the nature of the confrontations on board the vessels undermines their cause, and draws into question claims that they are acting in the best interests of the people in Gaza or whether they are merely trying to engineer confrontations with Israel.

A considerable amount of time and effort has been wasted with the flotillas, and the only potential positive to emerge will be if it leads to some relief for the people of Gaza. Unfortunately, it seems that Gaza itself is often lost in the din of hardliners on both sides who are using this incident to propagate their own jaundiced and militaristic views.
122
Vote
   


Hamas executions to continue in Gaza

April 28th 2010 06:37
Earlier this month, Hamas authorities executed two Palestinian men in the Gaza Strip for collaborating with Israel. Despite intense international scrutiny and condemnation from both Israeli and Palestinian human rights groups, Hamas authorities have stated that they will not hesitate to impose the death penalty on other collaborators.

Hamas Soldiers



According to an article published on the pro-Palestinian website ‘Electronic Intifada (EI), the two men were executed by firing squad and their bullet-riddled bodies were delivered to al-Shifa Hospital in Gaza City. The AFP news agency also stated that Samir Zakut, from the Palestinian human rights group Al-Misan said they were executed by firing squad before dawn. General Ahmad Attallah, Hamas’s head of judicial military affairs, confirmed the executions on an official government website.

Hamas, which is an acronym of the Arabic words meaning ‘Islamic Resistance Movement’, is a political party with a paramilitary component, they are perceived as a terrorist organisation by the U.S, the European Union, Canada, Israel and Japan: Australia only classifies Hamas' independent military wing, the Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades, as a terrorist organization. In the Palestinian territories, especially the Gaza Strip, Hamas has gained favour with the Palestinian people for their massive contribution to social welfare. Israeli scholar Reuvan Paz has stated “approximately 90 percent of the organisations work is in social, welfare, cultural and educational activities.”

Hamas legitimately won the Palestinian elections in 2006. This sparked an ongoing civil war with rival Palestinian political party, Fatah. The hostilities eventuated in Hamas controlling the Gaza Strip and Fatah controlling the West Bank.

Hamas military courts in Gaza accused Nasser Abu Frej, 34, from Rafah, southern Gaza and Muhammad al-Sebea, 36, from northern Gaza, of passing sensitive security information to Israel during the Gaza War which took place between Israel and Hamas during December, 2008 and January, 2009. The information was deemed responsible for the deaths of several Gazan resistance fighters.

These executions are the first implementation of the death penalty since Hamas took complete control of Gaza in June, 2007. Disregarding intense international condemnations of the killings, de facto interior minister Fathi Hammad said that his government “would not hesitate” to carry out further executions. He also stated that “The Hamas government will continue enforcing capital punishment in the coastal enclave against those who have caused harm to national interests and who were the cause of the death of many Palestinians.”

Israeli human rights group B’Tselem was heavily against the executions, stating "In addition to objection in principle to the death penalty, Thursday's executions were based on trials that did not meet even minimal standards of due process."

Human Rights Watch (HRW) member Bill van Esveld has expressed concerns over ‘the lack of transparency, due process and impartiality.” Stating, “We see Fatah members being sentenced to death in Hamas courts.”
101
Vote
   


On Monday, The Tel Aviv District Court allowed several new details in the Anat Kam affair to surface.


[ Click here to read more ]
168
Vote
   


Melbourne MC Mantra will soon be hitting the road with Urthboy for a nationwide tour. Mantras recently released debut album Power of the Spoken has been named ‘Feature Album’ for this week, by Triple J radio station.

Power of the Spoken features production from Mista Savona, M-Phazes, and Count Bounce; Mantra is quickly gaining a reputation for being one of the most lyrically sharp MC's in the game. He is also soon to feature as support for this weekend’s sold out Talib Kweli & Jean Grae Melbourne show


[ Click here to read more ]
84
Vote
   


An Israeli court last Thursday lifted a months-long gag order on the case of a young Israeli journalist charged with spying offences. The young woman, Anat Kam, 23, has been accused of stealing over 2,000 military documents and leaking them to a reporter for Israel's oldest daily newspaper, Haaretz.

Anat Kam

[ Click here to read more ]
151
Vote
   


A video showing a US military Apache chopper gunner mowing down a group of journalists in Eastern Baghdad in 2007 has been recently leaked onto the internet by Wikileaks. The U.S military has always claimed that the civilians killed were insurgents; this has been disproved by the recent release of this footage.


[ Click here to read more ]
165
Vote
   


Australian band, Powderfinger, at a press conference today, announced plans to disband following the completion of their most extensive Australian tour to date.


[ Click here to read more ]
188
Vote
   


Salutations,

My name is Tim Lawson and I am taking over this fantastic blog from the former writer Thomas J Craven. I am a Journalism student and I write and edit several student publications. I have also recently started doing some freelance journalism in addition to my studies


[ Click here to read more ]
109
Vote
   


For the last three decades, the Catholic Church has been plagued by accusations, scandals and lawsuits associated predominantly with the sexual abuse of minors by Catholic priests. On the 18th of March this year, Pope Benedict XVI issued a formal apology to victims of child sex abuse by members of the clergy in Ireland; he also ordered an official inquiry in Ireland to address the scandal that has recently been brought to light as new cases have occurred across Europe.


[ Click here to read more ]
182
Vote
   


More Posts
1 Posts
1 Posts
9 Posts
34 Posts dating from April 2008
Email Subscription
Receive e-mail notifications of new posts on this blog:

Tim lawson's Blogs

51 Vote(s)
0 Comment(s)
1 Post(s)
Moderated by Tim lawson
Copyright © 2006 2007 2008 On Topic Media PTY LTD. All Rights Reserved. Design by Vimu.com.
On Topic Media ZPages: Sydney |  Melbourne |  Brisbane |  London |  Birmingham |  Leeds     [ Advertise ] [ Contact Us ] [ Privacy Policy ]